Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize (Zea mays L.)
Published on: June 16, 2018
Ingredient count is not a reliable indicator of nutritional quality: analysis across and within five processed food
Isabelle Petitclerc1, Sonia Pomerleau2, Clara-Jane Rhéaume2
1Centre de recherche Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods (INAF), Université Laval, 2440, boulevard Hochelaga, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada; School of Nutrition, Université Laval, 2440, boulevard Hochelaga, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Background:
Choosing products with fewer ingredients is commonly recommended to promote healthier food choices. However, the association between ingredient count and nutritional quality is poorly documented.
Objective:
To investigate the association between ingredient count and overall nutritional quality of products within five processed food categories in Québec, Canada.
Design:
In this cross-sectional study, all products from the studied food categories were purchased from food retailers.
Setting:
A total of 1930 products were analyzed across five food categories (2021-2024) in Québec City: sliced breads (n=340), pasta sauces (n=347), sliced processed meats (n=487), granola bars (n = 369), and yogurts and dairy desserts (n=387).
Main Outcome Measure:
Ingredient counts were double-coded, both manually and in R. Nutritional quality was assessed using two nutrient profiling systems: the Nutri-Score (NS) and the Canadian front-of-pack nutrition symbol (C-FOP).
Statistical Analyses Performed:
Analyses were performed in R. Linear regressions were used to assess the association between ingredient count and NS, while logistic regressions were used for the C-FOP.
Results:
Using the NS, higher ingredient counts were associated with a poorer nutritional quality (higher NS) in pasta sauces (β=0.37, p <0.001), granola bars (β=0.18, p <0.001), and yogurts and dairy desserts (β= 0.08, p=0.006), with variation by subcategories for sliced breads, pasta sauces, and sliced processed meats (p<0.05). Using the C-FOP, higher ingredient counts were associated with a better nutritional quality (lower probability of displaying the C-FOP) in sliced breads (β=-0.09, p <0.001), and yogurts and dairy desserts (β=-0.07, p=0.003), but with poorer nutritional quality in pasta sauces (β=0.14, p <0.001), with variation by subcategories for granola bars, yogurts and dairy desserts with the C-FOP (p<0.05).
Conclusion:
The association between ingredient count and nutritional quality in processed food is heterogeneous and varies between and within food categories. Hence, for foods available in Québec, it would be preferable not to recommend relying solely on ingredient count to assess the nutritional quality of foods.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Sources of Food Contamination
