Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section
Published on: July 19, 2016
Predictive factors of delayed braid deformation in DFT flow diverters
Fernanda Rodriguez-Erazú1, Jildaz Caroff2,3, Dan Adrian Popica2
1Interventional Neuroradiology (NEURI Vascular Center), Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France mfrerazu@gmail.com.
Background:
Concerns have arisen regarding flow diverter braid deformation (FDBD), particularly with last-generation platinum drawn-filled tube (DFT) wire devices. Braid deformation is likely multifactorial, influenced by patient characteristics, device selection, and procedural factors, yet no clinical analysis has systematically identified predictive factors. We conducted a study to determine the incidence, patterns, and predictors of braid deformation with these devices.
Methods:
Consecutive intracranial aneurysms treated with various flow diverters (FDs) constructed with DFT wires between June 2018 and June 2024 were included. High-resolution cone-beam CT with diluted contrast (vasoCT) and angiograms were reviewed to identify and classify FDBD following international consensus definitions. Patient, aneurysm, anatomy, procedural, and FD characteristics were retrieved and analyzed using univariate and multivariable analyses.
Results:
A total of 102 patients were included. FDBD was observed in 28 patients (27%), comprising 41 deformations. Three independent predictors of FDBD were identified: short distal landing zone (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.98; P=0.04), FD proximal oversizing (aOR 40.05, 95% CI 5.14 to 405.23; P<0.01), and younger age (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.98; P<0.01). Internal carotid artery aneurysms were also associated with FDBD in the univariate analysis (P<0.05).
Conclusion:
FDBD with DFT FDs is a frequent phenomenon observed in about 1/4 cases, associated with symptomatic complications but without affecting permanent morbidity. Patient age and technical factors such as short landing zone and FD oversizing were independent predictors of FDBD. This analysis may help to guide operator decisions when using DFT FDs and support future research in this field.
Related Concept Videos
Major Losses in Pipes
Fluid flow can be classified as laminar or turbulent, primarily based on the Reynolds number. This dimensionless number reflects the relative influence of inertial to viscous...
Temperature Dependent Deformation
Thin-Walled Hollow Shafts
Typical Model Studies
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Underflow Gates

