Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Cell-Free DNA Integrity Analysis in Urine Samples
Published on: January 5, 2017
Germline testing in urothelial cancer: A narrative review of evidence, guidelines, and testing frameworks
Steven M Monda1, Tobias Else2, Alex Zhu3
1Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract:
Approximately 10% to 14% of urothelial cancer patients harbor pathogenic germline variants, rising to 15% to 20% in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), where mismatch repair (MMR) gene variants associated with Lynch syndrome are a major contributor. Despite this substantial burden of germline mutation risk, urothelial cancer still lacks the guideline framework that has made germline testing standard practice in comparable malignancies. Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary cause of urothelial cancer, and MSH2 confers the greatest urothelial cancer risk among the 4 MMR genes. MMR-deficient tumors show marked sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibition across tumor types. Beyond Lynch syndrome, germline variants in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, particularly BRCA2, may be enriched in urothelial cancer and have important cascade testing implications for families, regardless of therapeutic actionability. Tumor-based MMR screening using immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing provides a practical but imperfect route to detection, with tissue availability posing a particular challenge in UTUC. In this review, we outline current guidelines, summarize the prevalence of germline pathogenic (and likely pathogenic) variants across the urothelial cancer spectrum, discuss pathways for MMR testing, and identify key gaps in the field-including the case for universal germline evaluation in UTUC, the absence of a bladder cancer testing framework, and the opportunity represented by somatic-to-germline testing pathways.