Related Experiment Videos
Impact of pulse modulation technology on operating room time and blood loss in HoLEP: real-world data from an
Juanita Velasquez-Ospina1, Sabika Sadiq2, Ansh Bhatia3
1Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA. juanitavelasquezo@gmail.com.
Purpose:
To compare perioperative and functional outcomes of standard holmium, Moses 1.0, and Moses 2.0 laser enucleation performed at an academic center with trainee involvement.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed men undergoing HoLEP between June 2022 and May 2024. Patients were grouped by laser platform: standard holmium, Moses 1.0, or Moses 2.0. Baseline demographics, perioperative data, complications, and functional outcomes up to six months were analyzed using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results:
Among 389 patients (standard holmium 206; Moses 1.0 126; Moses 2.0 57), baseline characteristics were similar. Median operative times were 95, 105, and 100 min for standard holmium, Moses 1.0, and Moses 2.0, respectively (p = 0.25), and median prostate weights were comparable (84 g, 85 g, 79 g; p = 0.44). Hospital stay was slightly longer with Moses lasers (1.6 vs. 1.4 days, p < 0.001), though this difference is unlikely to be clinically significant. Objective measures of bleeding-postoperative hemoglobin drop (1.7-2.0 g/dL) and transfusion rates (0-1.6%)-did not differ significantly between groups. Postoperative catheter duration, hospital stay, and complication rates were also comparable. Functional outcomes improved in all groups through 6 months, with no intergroup differences.
Conclusion:
HoLEP is safe and effective across conventional holmium, Moses 1.0, and Moses 2.0 platforms, with comparable perioperative and functional outcomes. Although the literature suggests that Moses 2.0 may facilitate same-day discharge, its absence should not limit HoLEP availability, and platform selection may reasonably reflect institutional resources and surgeon preference.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...