Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
Intra-abdominal pressure in children receiving peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury
Peter Nourse1, Mignon McCulloch1, Ashton Coetzee1
1Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Insights
Critically ill children on peritoneal dialysis (PD) often experience increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), but this study found no serious complications despite high IAP levels. Monitoring IAP is crucial in these pediatric patients undergoing PD.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Peritoneal Dialysis
Background:
- Critically ill children undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) face a heightened risk of elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) in this population necessitates careful management of PD parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and associated complications in critically ill children with AKI using conventional PD and continuous flow PD (CFPD).
- To compare direct PD catheter manometry with indirect bladder catheter transducer measurements for IAP assessment.
- To evaluate IAP and complications with a standard PD fill volume.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled crossover trial involving 15 critically ill children (median age 6 months).
- Analysis of within- and between-group changes in IAP, blood pressure, and ventilation parameters.
- Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation tests used to assess agreement between direct and intravesicular IAP measurement techniques.
Main Results:
- 60% of participants exhibited raised IAP (>10 mmHg) post-filling, with no reported compartment syndrome or other severe complications.
- Mean IAP values did not significantly differ between conventional PD and CFPD (p > 0.5) regardless of measurement method.
- Intravesicular IAP measurements were significantly higher than direct measurements (p = 0.002), but showed good correlation (r=0.7) and moderate reliability (ICC=0.6).
Conclusions:
- Elevated IAP is common in critically ill children on PD but was not associated with serious adverse events in this cohort.
- Monitoring IAP is warranted in this patient group.
- Discrepancies exist between direct and indirect IAP measurement techniques, necessitating further research to define optimal practices for pediatric PD patients.
Abstract:
BackgroundCritically ill children on peritoneal dialysis (PD) are at an increased risk of raised intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). The aim of this study was to describe IAP and complications with a standard PD fill volume, using conventional PD and continuous flow PD (CFPD) in critically ill children with acute kidney injury. A secondary objective was to compare two IAP measurement techniques, which were direct measurement from the PD catheter via a manometer and indirect measurement via the bladder catheter to a transducer.MethodThis study was a secondary analysis of a previously published randomized controlled crossover trial. Within- and between-group changes in IAP, blood pressure and ventilation parameters were analysed using paired t-tests. Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation tests were used to assess agreement between direct and intravesicular measurement of IAP.ResultsFifteen participants (median (range) age and weight 6.0 (0.2-14) months and 5.8 (2.3-14.0) kg) were included, of which 9 (60%) had raised IAP (>10 mmHg) after filling. No children developed compartment syndrome or other complications. Mean ± standard deviation IAP on conventional versus CFPD was 9.35 ± 2.97 and 11.5 ± 2.96 versus 9.3 ± 3.35 and 11.2 ± 3.62 when measured directly and indirectly, respectively (p > 0.5). Intravesicular measurement of IAP was constantly significantly higher compared to the direct method (p = 0.002); however, there was good correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.7; p < 0.001) and moderate reliability (ICC = 0.6) between the methods.ConclusionIncreased IAP (>10 mmHg) was common, although not associated with serious adverse events, and warrants monitoring in these patients. The pressures measured are different with the two techniques used, although they do correlate well. More studies are needed to define increased IAP depending on the measuring technique and inform IAP measurement practice in children with acute PD.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
