Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

09:53
Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
Published on: August 16, 2020
Beyond static biomarkers: systems biology and AI for decoding cancer dynamics
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology (IBMZ), Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Frontiers in Systems Biology
|July 29, 2026
Summary
Cancer is a dynamic system, not a fixed identity. Future biomarkers must predict cancer
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Oncology
- Systems Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Precision oncology relies on static biomarkers (mutations, receptor status) that fail to capture cancer's dynamic nature.
- Cancer exhibits complex behaviors like progression, metastasis, and relapse, driven by dynamic, multiscale processes.
- Current biomarkers are mismatched to the inherent stochasticity and adaptability of cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a framework for understanding cancer as a dynamic, stochastic system.
- To advocate for biomarkers that predict cancer's future states, not just current status.
- To integrate diverse research areas into a unified model of cancer dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Developing a mathematically grounded framework using stochastic state-space models and layer-specific dynamical motifs.
- Distinguishing latent biological states from observable clinical data and addressing challenges of partial observability.
- Integrating six biological layers (molecular, cellular, spatial, ecosystem, metabolic-epigenetic, mechanobiological) and a clinical observation layer.
Main Results:
- Proposed a novel framework viewing cancer as a dynamic, coupled biological system.
- Identified key dynamic processes including cellular plasticity, spatial organization, and metabolic-epigenetic coupling.
- Highlighted the critical role of noise (transcriptional, ecological, treatment-induced, measurement) in cancer state dynamics.
Conclusions:
- Future biomarkers should estimate transition risk, system instability, and trajectory direction, moving beyond static classification.
- Artificial intelligence can aid inference in dynamic oncology, complementing mechanistic understanding.
- Translating dynamic oncology into a reproducible clinical discipline requires addressing regulatory and health-equity considerations.