Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Toward a cognitive-developmental understanding of mental toughness
Merle Berg1, Konstantinos Velentzas1,2, Thomas Schack1,2
1Department of Sport Science, University Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Theoretical Background:
Mental toughness (MT) is a crucial psychological construct that enables athletes to perform high-level sports. Despite extensive research, MT suffers from conceptual ambiguity that oscillates between trait- and state-based interpretations. Despite this controversy, a widely accepted developmental framework of mental toughness, known as the Mental Toughness Pyramid has received widespread acceptance in the scientific field of sport psychology, delivering its fundamentals to researchers and practitioners.
Aim:
The aim of this study is to critically reflect on existing research, theoretical models, and approaches regarding the concept of MT to provide new theoretical evidence that will help extend and specify the current understanding and work in the specific field. Specifically, our attempt is to enhance Mental Toughness Pyramid model precision by adding a cognitive-affective perspective and experience level. This approach can facilitate the work of researchers and practitioners.
Methods:
A semantic analysis and review of existing literature with the help of a database search was conducted primarily using Google Scholar and PubMed to identify relevant studies on the topic of MT and applied sport psychology. The initial focus was on review articles and foundational literature, which served as the basis for expanding the search to additional relevant sources. This approach ensured a thorough understanding of the current state of research and key theoretical frameworks in the field. In order to elaborate on existing findings, a link to further domains (e.g., psychological skills training, routine, and self-regulation) was established.
Conclusion:
The debate now shifts from a trait vs. state dichotomy to understanding MT as a multifaceted construct shaped by dynamic interactions among environment, personality, cognition, behavior, learning, and experience. From this point of view, we suggest an extension of Mental Toughness Pyramid in order to enhance the precision of researchers' and practitioners' work.
Related Concept Videos
Growth versus Fixed Mindset
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Information Processing Approach
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Cognitive Dissonance

