Related Experiment Videos

Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy for Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Single-Center Study

Chien-Po Huang1, Tien-Ping Tsao1,2, Hao-Neng Fu1

  • 1Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital.

Insights

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) effectively treats calcified coronary lesions, with a 1-year MACE rate of 14.9%. End-stage renal disease and stent under-expansion were linked to worse outcomes in this Taiwanese study.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an innovative technique for modifying calcified coronary lesions to improve stent expansion.
  • Real-world data on IVL efficacy in Asian populations, particularly for complex cases, is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the procedural success and safety of IVL in Taiwanese patients with complex calcified coronary lesions.
  • To evaluate the 1-year clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), following IVL treatment.
  • To identify predictors of adverse outcomes after IVL.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective single-center cohort study involving patients treated with IVL for complex calcified coronary lesions.
  • Data collection spanned from November 2022 to October 2024.
  • Analysis included procedural success, safety, 1-year MACE rates, and subgroup analyses.

Main Results:

  • The 1-year MACE rate was 13.6% (raw), with a Kaplan-Meier estimate of 14.9%.
  • Key MACE components included cardiac death (1.5%), myocardial infarction (4.5%), and ischemia-driven revascularization (7.6%).
  • End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and non-bifurcation lesions were associated with significantly higher MACE and revascularization rates. Stent under-expansion predicted revascularization.

Conclusions:

  • Intravascular lithotripsy demonstrates safety and effectiveness in managing complex calcified coronary artery disease.
  • Patient outcomes are significantly impacted by renal function (specifically ESRD) and the degree of stent expansion post-procedure.
  • IVL offers a viable treatment option, but careful patient selection and procedural optimization are crucial, especially for those with comorbidities like ESRD.
Abstract