Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Centering Community in Evidence-Based Prevention: Enhancing Evidence Criteria and Processes Across a State-Level
Brittany Rhoades Cooper1, Eleanor Dizon2, Gitanjali Shrestha2
1Department of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. brittany.cooper@wsu.edu.
Washington State updated its evidence-based program registries (EBPRs) to better include community-valued programs. This initiative balances scientific rigor with responsiveness to diverse community needs in youth substance use prevention.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Prevention Science
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Evidence-based program registries (EBPRs) are crucial for translating prevention science into community resources.
- Traditional EBPRs may exclude programs not meeting strict methodological standards, limiting responsiveness to community needs.
- Strengthening state prevention infrastructure requires adapting evidence review processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe a multiphase initiative by the Washington State Health Care Authority (HCA) to enhance statewide evidence review processes for youth substance use prevention programs.
- To outline HCA's evolving approach, balancing scientific rigor with community responsiveness.
- To provide practical guidance for other states aiming to improve their prevention infrastructure.
Main Methods:
- A four-phase approach was implemented, including literature review and expert consultations.
- Recommendations were developed through collaboration with research, policy, and practice experts.
- System-level actions operationalized recommendations for evidence review processes.
Main Results:
- Key recommendations focused on creating pathways for community-valued programs.
- A continuum-based approach was proposed to acknowledge varying levels of evidence.
- Structured engagement processes for community and practitioner input were embedded.
Conclusions:
- The initiative strengthened Washington's prevention infrastructure by improving evidence review processes.
- The approach enhances responsiveness to community needs while maintaining scientific rigor.
- Iterative and collaborative methods offer a model for other states seeking to optimize prevention program selection.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...