Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Novel Method to Determine the Longitudinal Antibacterial Activity of Drug-Eluting Materials
Published on: March 3, 2023
Antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens in joint replacement surgery: Susceptibility and PK/PD target attainment
Alba Rivera1, Sonia Luque2, Isabel Mur3
1Department of Microbiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
Effective surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis requires activity against likely pathogens and antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout surgery. We compared microbiological coverage and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of cefazolin, cefuroxime or vancomycin, alone or with gentamicin, for primary total knee or hip arthroplasty.
Methods:
We linked two datasets: archived prosthetic joint infection isolates after primary total knee or hip arthroplasty, used for susceptibility testing and MIC determination; and plasma antibiotic concentrations at closure from a 135-patient prospective cohort receiving a study regimen. We assessed microbiological coverage (percentage of isolates susceptible to ≥1 antibiotic) and PK/PD target attainment (percentage with isolate-specific MICs below the free plasma concentration at closure of ≥1 antibiotic, irrespective of categorical susceptibility).
Results:
Among 75 isolates, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (27; 36%) and Staphylococcus aureus (26; 35%) predominated. Single-agent coverage and PK/PD attainment were 49.3% and 72.0% for cefazolin, 52.0% and 64.0% for cefuroxime, and 81.3% and 81.3% for vancomycin. Only cefazolin showed a significant discrepancy between microbiological coverage and PK/PD attainment (P = 0.004), mainly due to methicillin-resistant CoNS: 13/19 (68.4%) had MICs below the free concentration at closure despite categorical non-susceptibility. Gentamicin increased coverage (to 80.0%, 81.3% and 96.0%) and PK/PD attainment (to 89.3%, 82.7% and 96.0%), mainly through improved Gram-negative activity. Vancomycin-containing regimens outperformed cefuroxime-containing, but not cefazolin-containing, regimens in PK/PD attainment.
Conclusions:
Cefazolin may retain prophylactic activity against methicillin-resistant CoNS despite categorical non-susceptibility. Vancomycin-containing regimens had the highest PK/PD performance but were not significantly superior to cefazolin-based regimens. Gentamicin improved Gram-negative activity.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
