Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

11:28
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Investigation of Stresses Induced by Different Framework Materials in Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis Using Finite
H C Basarir1, E G Basaran2, A I Zengingul2
1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Batman University, Batman, Turkey.
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
|July 29, 2026
Summary
Prosthetic framework material significantly impacts stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Lower elastic modulus materials like polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) increase stress, while monolithic zirconia minimizes it.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials science
- Dental implantology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Material selection and prosthetic design are critical for stress distribution and load transmission in the implant-prosthesis complex.
- Understanding these factors is essential for long-term implant success and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the stress distribution effects of various prosthetic framework materials in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
- To analyze stress patterns using titanium and zirconia abutments via three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Main Methods:
- Modeled titanium implants with titanium and zirconia abutments.
- Created finite element models with six framework materials and four veneering types.
- Applied vertical and oblique loads to analyze von Mises and tensile stresses in implants, abutments, bone, and superstructures.
Main Results:
- Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) groups exhibited the highest stresses.
- Monolithic zirconia demonstrated the lowest stress levels across components.
- Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) and PEEK showed highest cortical bone stress under oblique and vertical loading, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Framework material choice significantly influences stress distribution in implant components, peri-implant bone, and superstructures.
- Materials with lower elastic modulus concentrate higher stresses in surrounding bone and implant structures.
- Monolithic zirconia emerges as a favorable material for minimizing stress accumulation.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of Stress
Consider a structure made of a boom and a rod designed to support a load. These two components are connected by a pin and stabilized by brackets and pins. The boom and the rod are detached from their supports to assess the different stresses imposed on this structure, and a free-body diagram is drawn. Then, all the forces applied, including the load acting on the structure, are identified. The reaction forces exerted on both the boom and the rod are computed using the equilibrium equations.
The...
The...
Bearing Stress
Bearing stress refers to the contact pressure between two separate bodies. To visualize this, imagine a bolt thrust through a plate. The bolt applies a force to the plate, which exerts an equal but opposite force back onto the bolt. This force isn't just a singular entity but a compilation of numerous smaller forces distributed across the contact surface between the bolt and the plate.
Due to the intricacy of these microforces, an average value, known as bearing stress, is often used by...
Due to the intricacy of these microforces, an average value, known as bearing stress, is often used by...
