Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Research Priority Setting Is Not Research: A Call for Ethical Clarity in Australia
Bec Jenkinson1, Gordon McGurk2, Jonathan Quicke3,4
1UQ Clinical Trials Capability (ULTRA), School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract:
In Australia, research priority setting (RPS) may be misclassified as research requiring ethics approval, despite its purpose as a collaborative, pre-research involvement activity. Treating RPS as research creates delays, diverts resources and undermines partnership principles central to inclusive, community-centred priority setting. Recent revisions to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research clarify that pre-research consultation does not require ethics review, creating an opportunity for consistent national practice. We call for institutions to recognise RPS as involvement and provide proportionate, non-ethics oversight to accelerate RPS and deliver more responsive research agendas that reduce waste.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
