Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

A Rapid Screening Workflow to Identify Potential Combination Therapy for GBM using Patient-Derived Glioma Stem Cells
Published on: March 28, 2021
Entinostat and Tucidinostat Potentiate Temozolomide Response in Glioblastoma Models
Ruijie Chen1, Junhui Su1, Xinjue Dong1
1Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fudan University, 200120 Shanghai, China.
Background:
Glioblastoma (GBM) frequently develops resistance to temozolomide (TMZ), limiting the effectiveness of standard therapy. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have emerged as potential chemosensitizers; however, the comparative performance of these inhibitors and the associated mechanistic impact remain incompletely characterized.
Methods:
In vitro, this study systematically evaluated the effects of the Class I-selective HDAC inhibitors Entinostat and Tucidinostat, and the pan-HDAC inhibitor Vorinostat on TMZ sensitivity in multiple GBM cell lines (U87, U251, LN229). Additionally, this study assessed cell viability, morphology, and the expression of selected markers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), class III β-tubulin (TUBB3), and synapsin I (SYN1). In vivo, the therapeutic efficacy of Entinostat combined with TMZ was evaluated in a U87 xenograft mouse model by measuring tumor growth, and the expression of GFAP and TUBB3 was examined in tumor tissues. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9)-mediated knockout of HDAC1/2/3 was used to test the dependence of these effects on canonical Class I HDACs.
Results:
Entinostat and Tucidinostat significantly enhanced TMZ-induced cytotoxicity across all cell lines, demonstrating greater TMZ-sensitizing activity than Vorinostat under the conditions tested. Treatment was associated with altered cell morphology and changes in marker expression, including reduced GFAP and increased MAP2 and TUBB3. In the U87 xenograft model, Entinostat combined with TMZ significantly suppressed tumor growth and was associated with decreased GFAP and increased TUBB3 expression. Importantly, both TMZ sensitization and the associated morphological and marker changes persisted in HDAC1/2/3-knockout cells, suggesting that the effects are not fully explained by HDAC1/2/3 depletion. These effects were consistent across multiple cell lines and in xenograft tumors.
Conclusions:
Entinostat and Tucidinostat enhance TMZ sensitivity in GBM models and are associated with specific markers and morphological changes that persist despite HDAC1/2/3 knockout. These findings support further evaluation of Entinostat and Tucidinostat as TMZ-sensitizing agents in GBM models and highlight associated phenotypic and molecular changes that warrant further mechanistic validation.
Insights
Entinostat and Tucidinostat enhance temozolomide (TMZ) effectiveness in glioblastoma (GBM) models. These histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors show promise in overcoming treatment resistance by altering cell markers and morphology.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Cancer epigenetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Glioblastoma (GBM) often develops resistance to temozolomide (TMZ), a standard therapy.
- Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are explored as chemosensitizers, but their comparative efficacy and mechanisms in GBM are unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate Class I-selective HDAC inhibitors (Entinostat, Tucidinostat) and a pan-HDAC inhibitor (Vorinostat) for their ability to enhance TMZ sensitivity in GBM.
- To investigate the effects of these inhibitors on GBM cell viability, morphology, and specific marker expression.
- To assess the in vivo efficacy of Entinostat combined with TMZ and explore the role of HDAC1/2/3.
Main Methods:
- In vitro evaluation of Entinostat, Tucidinostat, and Vorinostat on TMZ sensitivity across multiple GBM cell lines.
- Assessment of cell viability, morphology, and expression of GFAP, MAP2, TUBB3, and SYN1.
- In vivo study using a U87 xenograft model with Entinostat and TMZ, including tumor growth and marker analysis, alongside CRISPR-Cas9 mediated HDAC1/2/3 knockout experiments.
Main Results:
- Entinostat and Tucidinostat significantly increased TMZ-induced cytotoxicity in all tested GBM cell lines, outperforming Vorinostat.
- Treatment led to altered cell morphology and changes in marker expression, including decreased GFAP and increased MAP2 and TUBB3.
- In vivo, Entinostat plus TMZ suppressed tumor growth, with decreased GFAP and increased TUBB3. Sensitization effects persisted even after HDAC1/2/3 knockout.
Conclusions:
- Entinostat and Tucidinostat effectively enhance TMZ sensitivity in GBM models.
- Associated phenotypic and molecular changes, including marker alterations, persist independently of HDAC1/2/3 depletion.
- These findings support further investigation of Entinostat and Tucidinostat as chemosensitizers for GBM treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs that Stabilize Microtubules
Tumor Immunotherapy

