Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose
Published on: October 14, 2015
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Among Individuals Undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing
Fahima Dossa1, Kelly Metcalfe2,3, Zharmaine Ante4
1Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Importance:
Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer substantial risks of breast and ovarian cancer; however, risk for female individuals undergoing testing, particularly those with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or negative results, remain poorly defined.
Objective:
To estimate lifetime incidence of breast and ovarian cancer among female individuals undergoing BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing across all result categories and evaluate the modifying association of family history.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This retrospective cohort study was conducted as part of the What Comes Next Cohort Study, a near-population-based cohort in Ontario, Canada, established through linkage with administrative databases. Female participants who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing from 2007 to 2016 were matched 1:5 to females from the general population. Participants were followed up to September 2024. Data were analyzed from May to December 2025.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The outcome of interest was the cumulative incidence of breast and ovarian cancer to age 80 years, stratified by genetic test result and family history.
Results:
Of 15 986 individuals in the What Comes Next Cohort Study cohort, 6966 individuals eligible for breast cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 49 [38-60] years) were matched to 34 830 individuals from the general population and 13 276 individuals eligible for ovarian cancer analyses (median [IQR] age, 51 [41-61] years) were matched to 66 380 individuals from the general population. Cumulative breast cancer incidence to age 80 years was 62.1% (95% CI, 52.2%-69.9%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 66.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-72.9%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 12.0% (95% CI, 11.2%-12.8%) in the general population; corresponding ovarian cancer incidence was 56.0% (95% CI, 40.0%-67.7%) for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers and 29.3% (95% CI, 14.2%-41.7%) for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers, compared with 1.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.7%) in the general population. Family history modified breast cancer risk, reaching a cumulative incidence of 86.3% (95% CI, 70.9%-93.5%) in carriers with at least 2 affected first-degree relatives vs 55.8% (95% CI, 45.4%-64.2%) in carriers without a family history of breast cancer. Among individuals with test results positive for pathogenic variants, lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was similarly modified by family history, reaching 64.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-79.7%) in those with vs 38.2% (95% CI, 25.8%-48.4%) in those without a family history of ovarian cancer. Individuals with VUS and negative test results also had increased lifetime breast cancer risks (31.2% [95% CI, 19.2%-41.4%] and 26.3% [95% CI, 23.0%-29.4%], respectively) but no increase in ovarian cancer risk. Individuals with test results negative for a known familial variant had risks similar to the general population.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cohort study of females who underwent BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing, the lifetime cancer risk varied substantially across BRCA test result groups and was further modified by family history. Elevated breast cancer risk among individuals with VUS or negative results highlights the need for individualized risk assessment and management beyond genetic test results alone.
More Related Videos
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
08:53Identifying the Effects of BRCA1 Mutations on Homologous Recombination using Cells that Express Endogenous Wild-type BRCA1
Published on: February 17, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Some...