Transcriptional signatures indicating RB function correlate with response to CDK4/6 inhibition in endometrial cancer

Zelei Yang1, Upendra Raj Bhattarai2, Martin K Hayes3

  • 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA United States.

Abstract

Insights

RB function-predictive transcriptional signatures, not RB protein levels or mutations, predict response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in endometrial cancer (EC). This finding could improve patient selection for EC clinical trials.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) show promise in endometrial cancer (EC) treatment.
  • Biomarkers are needed to identify EC patients who will respond to CDK4/6is.
  • Current selection criteria for EC trials are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate RB functional status as a predictive biomarker for CDK4/6i response in EC.
  • To determine if RB function-predictive transcriptional signatures can identify responsive EC patients.
  • To move beyond histology and genetic alterations for EC patient stratification.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of RB1 and TP53 mutations, RB protein expression, and transcriptional profiles in 39 EC patients from two abemaciclib trials.
  • Assessment of RB function-predictive transcriptional signatures.
  • Correlation of these markers with objective response to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Main Results:

  • RB protein expression and RB1 mutation status did not correlate with response to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
  • Decreased activity of RB function-predictive transcriptional signatures correlated with response.
  • Reduced expression of specific E2F family members was associated with CDK4/6i response.

Conclusions:

  • RB function-predictive transcriptional signatures show potential as biomarkers for CDK4/6i response in EC.
  • These signatures may improve patient selection for EC clinical trials.
  • Further validation in clinical settings is warranted.

Related Concept Videos

Inhibition of Cdk Activity02:34

Inhibition of Cdk Activity

The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
Inhibition of CDK Activity02:34

Inhibition of CDK Activity

The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...