Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Impact of Timing and Format of Patient Decision Aids on Involvement in Shared Decision-Making for Patients With
Bettina Mølri Knudsen1, Stine Rauff Søndergaard2, Lea Lund1
1Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Background:
For people with breast cancer facing adjuvant treatment decisions, it is unclear whether providing a patient decision aid (PtDA) before versus during the consultation leads to greater involvement in shared decision-making (SDM). The overall aim was to evaluate the effect of a digital preconsult PtDA compared with an identical in-consult paper-based PtDA.
Patients And Methods:
In this randomized controlled trial, patients with breast cancer eligible for adjuvant treatment were randomized to a digital PtDA before consultation or a paper-based PtDA during consultation. Primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process_4. Secondary outcomes included observer-rated SDM (OPTION5/12), patient- and physician-reported SDM-Q, decisional conflict, CollaboRATE, preparation for decision-making, and consultation duration. Between-group differences were estimated using linear regression; post-consultation outcomes were analyzed with standard errors clustered at the physician level.
Results:
A total of 204 patients were randomized. Mean SDM Process_4 score was lower in the preconsult group, but not significant (P = .154). Observer-rated SDM was significantly higher in the in-consult group (OPTION5; P = .019; OPTION12: P = .005). The preconsult group reported lower decisional conflict before the consultation (P = .002) and lower preparation for decision-making (P = .004). No significant between-group differences were observed for post-consultation decisional conflict, SDM-Q, CollaboRATE, or consultation duration.
Conclusions:
Patient-reported SDM did not differ significantly between groups, but the paper-based in-consult PtDA was associated with higher observer-rated SDM. Digital PtDAs may reduce decisional conflict before consultation, but structured integration into the encounter may be needed to support observable SDM.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Cancer Survival Analysis
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...