Depression and amyloid-β across CSF, PET, and plasma biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alzheimer's disease is increasingly defined by biomarker evidence of amyloid-β and tau pathology, sharpening questions about whether late-life depression contributes to, or instead reflects, this pathology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2000 and 2025 that compared amyloid-β biomarkers in adults with and without depression, with depression defined by validated clinical diagnoses or symptom rating scales. Twenty-four studies were included, spanning three biomarker sources: cerebrospinal fluid, positron emission tomography imaging, and plasma. Across all sources, the pooled difference in amyloid-β burden between depressed and non-depressed individuals was small and clustered near zero, indicating only a weak, statistically non-significant tendency toward higher amyloid in depression. When the three sources were examined separately, each yielded a similar near-null result, although between-study heterogeneity was considerable for cerebrospinal fluid and plasma and moderate for imaging. Importantly, a prespecified subgroup analysis showed that imaging results diverged by quantification method: studies using the simpler standardized uptake value ratio clustered around zero, whereas the smaller group of studies using kinetic distribution volume ratio modelling showed a significant positive association, suggesting that methodological choices critically influence the observed relationship. Taken together, these findings indicate that depression is not consistently accompanied by greater amyloid-β burden across widely used biomarker platforms. The distribution volume ratio signal nonetheless raises the possibility of subtle associations that cruder methods may obscure, and suggests that depression may shape Alzheimer's disease trajectories more by modifying the clinical impact of amyloid than by altering its amount.