Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Decoding Biological Drug Names in Dermatology: The Post-2022 WHO Nomenclature Revision and Its Implications for
Shrishti Singh1, Yugal Kishor Sharma1, Aayush Gupta1
1Department of Dermatology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
The World Health Organization (WHO) revised biologic drug naming conventions in 2021-2022, introducing new stems for monoclonal antibodies and other therapies. Understanding these changes is crucial for dermatologists to ensure patient safety and informed treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Dermatology
- Drug Nomenclature
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) International Nonproprietary Names (INN) system for monoclonal antibodies was significantly revised in 2021-2022.
- The universal "-mab" suffix was replaced with structure-based stems (e.g., -tug, -bart, -ment, -mig), and new stems for JAK inhibitors (-citinib), BTK inhibitors (-brutinib), and oral peptide receptor antagonists (-kinra) were introduced.
- These nomenclature changes are not yet widely integrated into dermatology education, despite dermatologists' extensive use of diverse biologic drug classes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide dermatologists with a practical framework for understanding the revised WHO INN system for biologic drugs.
- To equip healthcare professionals with the knowledge to decode complex drug names based on their structure and mechanism of action.
- To highlight the importance of nomenclature literacy for patient safety, adverse event reporting, and biosimilar utilization.
Main Methods:
- A review of the WHO INN system revisions for biologic drug nomenclature.
- Development of a three-step algorithm for decoding biological drug names.
- Compilation of reference tables for 26 approved biologic agents.
- Guidance on biosimilar naming conventions across regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, CDSCO).
Main Results:
- The revised nomenclature system, with new structural stems, has direct pharmacokinetic implications.
- Two existing agents, sonelokimab and certolizumab pegol, are currently misclassified under the legacy "-mab" suffix.
- The review offers a disease-organized approach to understanding biologic drug names.
Conclusions:
- Nomenclature literacy is a critical patient safety competency for practicing dermatologists.
- Understanding the evolving drug naming system impacts adverse event attribution and biosimilar substitution decisions.
- A systematic approach to decoding biologic drug names is essential for navigating modern dermatological therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Nomenclature
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...