Related Experiment Videos
Clinician educators' participation in faculty development: A scoping review of academic and community-based settings
Erin Green1, Bridget O'Brien2, Manon Kluijtmans3,4
1Department of Physical Therapy, California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, California, USA.
Introduction:
Faculty development (FD) improves clinical teaching and supervision, yet many clinician educators (CEs) find it challenging to participate. Personal and environmental factors and the FD setting, i.e. academic medical center or community-based settings, likely affect CE participation. This scoping review explores what is known about: (1) personal and environmental factors and FD participation, and (2) how these factors differ based on whether the CE is situated in an academic medical center (AMC) or a community-based setting.
Methods:
We conducted a scoping review in CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science using terms related to clinical teacher, FD, and health professions. We included peer-reviewed articles published 2010-2025 discussing factors affecting CEs participation in FD in AMC and community-based settings. We synthesized data using conventional content analysis informed by social cognitive theory.
Results:
The search yielded 4,456 articles, of which we included 56. We identified personal factors (37 articles) and environmental factors (45 articles) affecting FD participation. Personal factors included motivation, beliefs, personal attributes, and identity. Environmental factors included access, program structure, provision of tools and information, interpersonal dynamics, incentives, policies and procedures, and workplace culture. Personal and environmental factors interacted to influence FD participation. Thirty-six articles discussed FD participation in AMCs, and 16 articles discussed community-based settings. While personal and environmental factors were largely consistent across settings, their manifestation, interaction, and impact differed between AMC and community-based settings.
Discussion:
This scoping review adds to our understanding of the factors affecting FD participation and the interaction among these factors, highlighting differences between AMCs and community-based settings. We recommend further exploration and consideration of FD approaches tailored to the unique blend of factors and their interactions in specific settings.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution itself.