Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Technological Change and Risk Adjustment: Benefit Design Incentives in Medicare Part D
1Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Martha van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Technological advancements can alter diagnosis profitability in Medicare Part D, influencing insurer benefit designs. Risk adjustment may not fully counteract these incentives, impacting equitable access to care.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pharmaceutical Policy
- Health Insurance Markets
Background:
- Subsidized health insurance markets utilize diagnosis-based risk adjustment to ensure equitable benefits for individuals with diverse healthcare costs.
- Technological changes, such as new drug approvals and generic competition, can significantly impact the profitability of specific medical diagnoses over time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how technological advancements affect diagnosis profitability within Medicare Part D.
- To determine if insurers adjust their benefit designs in response to changes in diagnosis profitability.
- To assess the effectiveness of risk adjustment in mitigating insurer incentives for selective enrollment in the presence of technological change.
Main Methods:
- The study analyzes data from Medicare Part D, focusing on the period after risk adjustment calibration.
- It examines the impact of new drug entry and generic competition on the profitability of specific diagnoses.
- Exploits variations in diagnosis profitability driven by technological change to analyze insurer benefit design strategies.
Main Results:
- Technological change, including new drug entry and generic competition, altered the profitability of certain diagnoses in Medicare Part D.
- Insurers designed more favorable benefits for drugs treating profitable diagnoses compared to unprofitable ones.
- These findings suggest that risk adjustment may not fully neutralize insurers' incentives to influence enrollment through benefit design when technological change is present.
Conclusions:
- Technological advancements can create profitable and unprofitable diagnoses, influencing insurer behavior in Medicare Part D.
- Benefit design strategies by insurers can be skewed towards more profitable diagnoses, even with risk adjustment.
- Risk adjustment mechanisms may require recalibration or complementary policies to fully address insurer selection incentives in dynamic markets.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview