Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
MMCRAG-Resp: a multi-modal corrective retrieval-augmented generation framework for explainable respiratory disease
A Anny Leema1, S Rajashri1, Mukundan Sriram1
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Background:
Standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems only use semantic similarity to retrieve information, and since this method is quite limiting, it may find clinically irrelevant evidence and produce outputs that are unsafe or hallucinated. This drawback is particularly important in respiratory care, where the diagnosis relies heavily on very accurate physiological indicators such as spirometry patterns and symptom profiles.
Methods:
We propose MMCRAG-Resp., a clinically grounded, physiology-aware corrective RAG framework for respiratory intelligence. The system harmonizes 17,516 patient records from three heterogeneous public datasets (Respiratory Sound Database, NHANES spirometry, and clinical guidelines) through a unified respiratory ontology. Multi-modal embeddings (acoustic, spirometric, and textual) are fused into 144-dimensional vectors and indexed in FAISS. A novel Respiratory Relevance Score (RRS) combining spirometric pattern agreement (weight 0.45), symptom overlap (0.30), and embedding similarity (0.25) gates evidence quality before LLM consumption via a three-path correction policy. A locally deployed small language model (Ollama; llama3.2, Mistral-7B-Instruct) generates evidence-constrained, fully traceable clinical explanations without GPU requirements.
Results:
Evaluated on 200 held-out test queries drawn from the harmonized corpus, MMCRAG-Resp achieved a Clinical Precision@10 of 0.81, a Hallucination Rate of 0.11 (71% relative reduction over Vanilla RAG), a Spirometry Alignment Score of 0.79, and an Evidence Citation Rate of 0.87. Ablation studies confirmed that spirometry-first scoring contributes the largest single-component gain. All pairwise comparisons with baselines were statistically significant (p < 0.001, McNemar's test; Cohen's d = 1.42).
Conclusion:
MMCRAG-Resp is, to the best of our knowledge, the first system combining multi-modal respiratory evidence retrieval, physiologically-grounded corrective RAG, and privacy-preserving local LLM inference in a single deployable clinical reasoning framework. The approach advances safe, explainable AI-assisted respiratory decision support.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
The Respiratory System
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
