Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Therapeutic Sclerostin Inhibition Compared With Alternative Anabolic Therapies: A

Maxim John Levy Barnett1, Justin Lam2, Catherine Anastasopoulou3

  • 1Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, jhu.edu.

Abstract

Insights

This study found romosozumab was associated with lower cardiovascular event risk in osteoporosis patients compared to other treatments. However, the association is not causal and requires further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Romosozumab, a sclerostin inhibitor, is approved for osteoporosis but carries a black-box warning for cardiovascular safety concerns.
  • The ARCH trial raised concerns, leading to a black-box warning, yet the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab remains unclear.
  • Previous investigations have not fully elucidated the cardiovascular safety profile of romosozumab.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the real-world association between romosozumab use and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in osteoporosis patients.
  • To compare cardiovascular safety signals between romosozumab and teriparatide/abaloparatide in a real-world setting.
  • To clarify the cardiovascular risk associated with romosozumab therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of real-world data from the TriNetX network over one year.
  • Inclusion of patients over 50 with osteoporosis, comparing romosozumab (Cohort A) to teriparatide/abaloparatide (Cohort B).
  • Propensity score matching was employed to minimize confounding factors, with no exclusion of patients with prior outcomes of interest.

Main Results:

  • Romosozumab use was associated with significantly lower hazard ratios for three- and four-point MACE (HR 0.624 and 0.441, respectively).
  • Improved survival probabilities were observed in the romosozumab cohort, with lower hazards for myocardial infarction, heart failure, and death.
  • No significant difference in cerebrovascular accidents was noted; E-value analyses suggested moderate robustness to unmeasured confounding.

Conclusions:

  • The real-world data suggest romosozumab is not associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but findings are associative, not causal.
  • Further prospective studies are necessary to definitively establish the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab.
  • Current findings do not warrant changes to existing regulatory recommendations regarding romosozumab use.