Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Impact of Left and Right Bundle Branch Block on Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Myocardial Mechanics Assessed
Andrea Sonaglioni1, Michele Lombardo1, Giulio Francesco Gramaglia2
1Division of Cardiology, IRCCS MultiMedica, Milan, Italy.
Insights
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) significantly impairs left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) showed no significant impact on these measures, suggesting deformation imaging is more sensitive to LBBB consequences.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Physiology
Background:
- Bundle branch blocks (BBB) can cause ventricular dyssynchrony and systolic dysfunction.
- Advanced imaging like speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) may detect subclinical dysfunction.
- Conventional left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may not fully capture these effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze systolic function and myocardial deformation in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB).
- To compare the impact of LBBB and RBBB on LVEF and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS).
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE for observational studies.
- Meta-analysis of LVEF and LV-GLS using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
- Separate analyses for LBBB and RBBB, and direct comparisons between them.
Main Results:
- LBBB patients showed significantly reduced LVEF and LV-GLS compared to controls.
- Isolated RBBB was not associated with significant differences in LVEF or LV-GLS.
- LBBB demonstrated greater impairment in both LVEF and LV-GLS compared to RBBB.
- STE studies showed larger effect sizes and greater heterogeneity than CMR-FT studies.
Conclusions:
- LBBB is strongly linked to impaired left ventricular systolic performance and mechanics.
- LV-GLS abnormalities are more pronounced than LVEF abnormalities in LBBB, indicating higher sensitivity of deformation imaging.
- Findings are hypothesis-generating due to study limitations and warrant further prospective research.
Background:
Bundle branch conduction abnormalities are associated with ventricular dyssynchrony, impaired myocardial mechanics, and progressive systolic dysfunction. Advanced deformation imaging techniques, including speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT), may identify subclinical ventricular dysfunction beyond conventional left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate conventional systolic function and myocardial deformation abnormalities associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB).
Methods:
PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for observational studies evaluating ventricular systolic function and myocardial deformation parameters in patients with LBBB and/or RBBB using STE and/or CMR-FT. Comparative meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Separate analyses were conducted for LVEF and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS).
Results:
Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review, whereas eight were eligible for quantitative meta-analysis. Compared with healthy controls, patients with LBBB demonstrated significantly reduced LVEF (SMD -0.404, 95% CI -0.553 to -0.255; p < 0.001) and impaired LV-GLS (SMD -0.345, 95% CI -0.535 to -0.156; p < 0.001). In contrast, isolated RBBB was not associated with significant overall differences in either LVEF (SMD 0.051, 95% CI -0.146 to 0.247; p = 0.613) or LV-GLS (SMD 0.064, 95% CI -0.134 to 0.262; p = 0.527). Direct comparisons demonstrated significantly greater impairment of both LVEF (SMD -0.361, 95% CI -0.519 to -0.202; p < 0.001) and LV-GLS (SMD -0.436, 95% CI -0.595 to -0.276; p < 0.001) in LBBB than in RBBB. STE-based studies generally demonstrated larger effect sizes and greater heterogeneity than CMR-FT investigations.
Conclusions:
Bundle branch conduction abnormalities, particularly LBBB, are closely associated with impaired left ventricular systolic performance and myocardial mechanics. LV-GLS abnormalities appeared consistently more pronounced than LVEF abnormalities across several comparisons, suggesting that myocardial deformation imaging may be more sensitive to the mechanical consequences of conduction abnormalities at a population level. Given the observational nature of the included studies, the substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity across populations, the limited evidence available for RBBB, and the potential influence of residual confounding factors such as age and underlying structural heart disease, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
09:05Transthoracic Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for the Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation
Published on: October 20, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests