Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
Retrospective dosimetric analysis and establishment of local typical dose values for otolaryngology scans performed
Djamel Dabli1, Oana Musteata2, Benjamin Lallemant2
1IMAGINE UR UM 103, Montpellier University, Department of Medical Imaging, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.
Purpose:
To analyze dosimetric data and establish local typical dose values (LTDVs) for otolaryngology scans performed on cone-beam CT (CBCT) MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dosimetric indicators were retrospectively collected for otorhinolaryngology examinations performed on a CBCT device. LTDVs were determined for each examination type using weighted computed tomography air kerma index (Cw), air kerma-length product (PKL), kerma-area product (PKA) and acquisition length. Cw, PKL and length were compared according to the acquisition protocols. CBCT LTDVs were compared with those obtained using multi-slice CT (MSCT) for inner ear and sinus examinations.
Results:
Inner ear examinations showed significantly higher Cw, PKL and PKA values than other examination types, with mean increases of 206.7 ± 15.8%, 29.0 ± 3.7% and 17.0 ± 2.3%, respectively (p < 0.001 and 0.50 ≤ ES ≤ 0.87). Salivary gland and sinus examinations showed similar values (0.503 ≤ p ≤ 0.749), while facial massif examinations showed significantly lower values -8.4 ± 0.0%, -4.8 ± 0.0% and -3.2 ± 0.6%, respectively (p < 0.041 and ES ≤ 0.20). The Cw decreased as the FOV increased and the opposite was found for PKL and acquisition length. CBCT's LTDVs were lower than with MSCT for the inner ear by 43.9 ± 1.7%. For sinuses, CBCT's LTDVs were 30% lower than the national diagnostic reference levels (NDRL) for Cw and 39.5% lower for PKL but 43.3 ± 1.9% higher than the LTDVs for MSCT.
Conclusion:
In CBCT-based ENT imaging, inner ear examinations involve the highest radiation doses, although these remain lower than with MSCT. Sinus doses are lower than MSCT NDRLs but higher than LTDVs.
More Related Videos
10:23Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022