Analyzing the Spectrum of mTBI Subgroups

Joshua A Beitchman1, Nyaz Didehbani2,3, Shane M Miller4,5,6

  • 1Pediatric Neurology Residency Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Neurotrauma Reports
|August 1, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients show varied recovery paths. Current symptom-based subtypes lack objective data and show overlap, hindering effective treatment for mTBI recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Traumatology

Background:

  • Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) presents diverse clinical outcomes.
  • Existing mTBI subtypes are primarily symptom-based and lack objective validation.
  • Variability in defining characteristics and limited objective data restrict clinical applicability of current mTBI subtypes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing literature on mTBI subtypes.
  • To analyze the characteristics and limitations of current symptom-based mTBI classifications.
  • To propose a more objective and integrated approach for mTBI subtyping.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of mTBI studies.
  • Analysis of reported mTBI subtypes based on symptoms and recovery timepoints.
  • Evaluation of terminology consistency and overlap in symptom-based subtyping.

Main Results:

  • Five predominant symptom-based mTBI subtypes identified: cognitive, somatosensory, vestibular-ocular, headache, and neuropsychiatric.
  • Subtypes are predominantly reported in the acute and subacute recovery phases post-injury.
  • Significant overlap and ambiguity exist among current symptom-based mTBI subtypes, compounded by inconsistent terminology.

Conclusions:

  • Current symptom-based mTBI subtyping lacks clinical utility due to heterogeneity and lack of objective measures.
  • Future mTBI subtyping should integrate objective assessments, biomarkers, neuroimaging, and genetic analysis.
  • Advancing mTBI subtyping can lead to personalized symptom management and improved patient care.