Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Mixed reality with real-time navigation grants low deviations from planned inclination and version of the glenoid for
Maxime Antoni1, Guillaume Marzolf1, Benoit Mariotte2
1Clinique de l'Orangerie, ELSAN, Strasbourg, France.
Background:
Correct glenoid version and inclination can limit scapular notching, instability, and glenoid loosening in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Traditionally, planned trajectories were displayed on a screen close to the operating table and reproduced freehand intraoperatively. Mixed reality planning has emerged, using superimposition of the scapular hologram on the patient's glenoid, with intended trajectories and real-time navigation to provide more accurate guidance. The purpose was to assess the implant version and inclination in rTSA using mixed reality with navigation.
Methods:
The authors retrospectively assessed a series of 45 shoulders that underwent rTSA using mixed reality with navigation using a head-mounted display. Computed tomography scans were acquired for each shoulder and imported into Shoulder+ to plan the rTSA and define the target inclination and version. The head-mounted display was used to display an interactive hologram over the operative site to navigate the guidewire. Pre-operative and 6-month post-operative scans were performed, and version and inclination of the implant were measured.
Results:
The final cohort comprised 35 shoulders, aged 75.5 ± 7.3 years. Additional operative time was 10.1 ± 2.5 minutes. The absolute deviation between post-operative and planned version was 2.8° ± 2.0 (P < .001), and the absolute deviation between post-operative and intraoperative version was 2.9° ± 2.1 (P = .003). The absolute deviation between post-operative and planned inclination was 4.6° ± 4.6 (P = .154), and the absolute deviation between post-operative and intraoperative inclination was 4.3° ± 4.3 (P = .074).
Conclusion:
rTSA with mixed reality navigation enables accurate glenoid implant positioning, with minimal deviations from planning. However, surgeons should be aware of the additional time required.

