The Omnicausal Model Reveals the Highly Polyfactorial Nature of Complex Diseases
Carla Márquez-Luna1,2, Martin Tournaire3, Ghislain Rocheleau1,2
1The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract:
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a human genetics method for inferring causal relationships between risk factors and diseases. A common focus of MR studies has been on the causal inference of a single risk factor on a single disease. This has led to the successful discovery of numerous causal risk factors for disease. However, it remains unclear how much each causal risk factor contributes to disease collectively. Here, we introduce the concept of "causality explained," that provides an estimator of the causal variance explained by a phenome-wide set of risk factors on complex diseases to assess how much causality can be potentially explained. The model is based on principal component regression which is a multivariate linear regression based on principal component analysis. In complement, we propose the "polyfactorial index" to assess the trajectory of causality explained as risk factors are sequentially added into the model, to characterize the causal architecture for a complex disease. We demonstrate that our model correctly assesses the causality explained and causal architecture in simulations across a wide range of parameters. To build our model, we used a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank compared to a set of 5 known risk factors for coronary artery disease. We observed that the phenome-wide set explains more than 45% of causality compared to 28.76% for the set of known risk factors. In addition, we tested our approach on 13 complex diseases and showed that the phenome-wide set can explain between 27% for anorexia to 80% for schizophrenia, with ever increasing trajectories of causality explained. We propose the "omnicausal model," which posits that a large number of risk factors individually explains a small amount to disease but collectively explain most of the causal variance. We distinguished core and peripheral causal factors that explain respectively a larger and a smaller part of causal variance. This approach provides insights into the underlying causal architecture between risk factors and disease.
Insights
Mendelian randomization (MR) can now quantify how much causality is explained by multiple risk factors for complex diseases. A phenome-wide approach reveals that numerous factors collectively explain significant disease variance, supporting the omnicausal model.
Area of Science:
- Human genetics
- Complex disease epidemiology
- Statistical genetics
Background:
- Mendelian randomization (MR) traditionally focuses on single risk factor-disease associations.
- The collective contribution of multiple risk factors to complex diseases remains largely unquantified.
- Understanding the causal architecture of diseases is crucial for effective prevention and treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for estimating the proportion of causal variance explained by a comprehensive set of risk factors for complex diseases.
- To introduce the "causality explained" estimator and the "polyfactorial index" to characterize disease causal architecture.
- To test the "omnicausal model" proposing that numerous factors collectively explain disease variance.
Main Methods:
- Utilized principal component regression, a multivariate linear regression technique based on principal component analysis.
- Applied a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank.
- Developed the "polyfactorial index" to assess the cumulative effect of sequentially added risk factors.
Main Results:
- The phenome-wide set of risk factors explained over 45% of causality for coronary artery disease, compared to 28.76% for known factors.
- Applied to 13 complex diseases, the phenome-wide set explained between 27% (anorexia) and 80% (schizophrenia) of causal variance.
- Demonstrated increasing "causality explained" trajectories as more risk factors were included, supporting the omnicausal model.
Conclusions:
- The "causality explained" estimator and "polyfactorial index" effectively assess disease causal architecture.
- The "omnicausal model" is supported, suggesting that complex diseases result from the collective effect of numerous small-effect risk factors.
- This approach provides novel insights into the complex interplay of risk factors in disease etiology.
Related Concept Videos
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Causality in Epidemiology
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Genomics
Polygenic Traits

