Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

09:49
Continuous-wave Thulium Laser for Heating Cultured Cells to Investigate Cellular Thermal Effects
Published on: June 30, 2017
Subthreshold micropulse laser and conventional subthreshold laser in diabetic macular edema
Lijun Zhou1, Zijing Li2, Chuangxin Huang1
1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, 54 South Xianlie Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
|August 1, 2026
Summary
Subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation (SMLP) and conventional subthreshold laser photocoagulation (SLP) show similar outcomes for diabetic macular edema (DME) over six months. SMLP may offer faster reduction in retinal thickness with potentially less damage.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Diseases
- Laser Therapy
Background:
- Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss in diabetic patients.
- Subthreshold laser photocoagulation aims to treat DME with reduced thermal damage compared to conventional methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare short-term morphological and visual function changes between subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation (SMLP) and conventional subthreshold laser photocoagulation (SLP) in diabetic macular edema (DME).
Main Methods:
- A prospective, paired, randomized controlled trial involving 66 eyes from 33 patients with clinically significant DME.
- Bilateral randomization of eyes to either SMLP or SLP treatment.
- Comprehensive assessments including visual acuity, optical coherence tomography, and microperimetry at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), or macular sensitivity between SMLP and SLP at 6 months.
- Earlier significant reduction in CMT observed in the SMLP group by month 3 compared to the SLP group at month 6.
- No significant differences in central choroidal thickness or fundus autofluorescence (FAF) area changes between groups.
Conclusions:
- SMLP demonstrates comparable efficacy to conventional SLP for DME treatment over a 6-month period.
- SMLP may offer an advantage with earlier CMT reduction and potentially less retinal damage.