Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Autopsy in sudden unexplained death in youth: indispensable or in some cases redundant? An observational study
A C van der Gugten1, T M Wemeijer2,3, B A Semmekrot4
1Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Sudden Unexplained Death in Youth (SUDY) requires thorough investigation to identify underlying causes and guide prevention strategies. In the Netherlands, cases are investigated using the standardized Postmortem Evaluation of Sudden Unexplained Death in Infants and Children (PESUDIC), in which autopsy is offered as a standard component. However, its invasive nature and associated time burden may limit parental acceptance. This study evaluated to what extent the cause of death can be established using a limited set of diagnostic tests compared to the standard procedure including autopsy. In this observational study, children > 2 years of age who died suddenly and unexpectedly and underwent PESUDIC, including imaging and autopsy, were included. Two expert panels, consisting of a forensic and a pediatric specialist, independently assessed early diagnostic tests available before autopsy. Cases were classified by level of diagnostic certainty and need for autopsy. Panel conclusions were compared with the reference standard: a multidisciplinary audit incorporating all available information, including autopsy findings. Sixty-six cases were included (median age 12 years (IQR 4-14.7), 63% male). Panels identified indicative information for a cause of death in 60 patients (91%). Nevertheless, autopsy was required in most cases (n = 59) to confirm the diagnosis. In 7 cases (10.6%), panels were sufficiently confident to establish the cause of death without autopsy with complete agreement with the reference standard. Causes included obstructive gastrointestinal pathology (n = 5) and diabetic ketoacidosis with dehydration (n = 2).
Conclusions:
Only a small proportion of children > 2 years of age with sudden unexpected death have a cause of death that can be established with sufficient certainty at an early stage. In the vast majority of cases, the cause of death remains uncertain, supporting the recommendation to perform an autopsy.
What Is Known:
• Autopsy in sudden unexplained death in youth is worldwide recognized as the gold standard for postmortem examination. However, its invasive nature and associated time burden may limit parental acceptance.
What Is New:
• In 7 of 60 sudden and unexplained deceased minors (10%), sufficient certainty regarding the cause of death can be obtained by other minimal invasive diagnostic test, so without the need of an autopsy. Causes without the need of an autopsy included obstructive gastrointestinal pathology and diabetic ketoacidosis with dehydration.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Naturalistic Observations
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Case Studies
Longitudinal Research
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

