Feasibility and Measurement Quality of Home-Based Smartphone Spirometry in Children With Suspected Asthma: A

Antonia Knopek1, Hanna Fabinyi2, Viktoria Zach2

  • 1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.

Pediatric Pulmonology
|August 3, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Smartphone spirometry is feasible for diagnosing childhood asthma at home. While compliance and quality were moderate, automated grading closely matched manual review, supporting its clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Digital Health Technologies
  • Asthma Diagnostics

Background:

  • Diagnosing asthma in children is challenging due to intermittent symptoms and limited in-clinic testing.
  • Smartphone spirometry offers a promising solution for at-home, repeated lung function measurements.
  • Feasibility data for smartphone spirometry in children with suspected asthma are scarce.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate compliance and measurement quality of smartphone spirometry in children with suspected asthma.
  • Assess agreement between manual and automated grading of spirometry data.
  • Identify factors influencing compliance and quality.

Main Methods:

  • A multicentre prospective study involving 102 children (5-16 years) with suspected asthma.
  • Participants performed daily smartphone spirometry for 7 days.
  • Measurement quality assessed via ATS/ERS 2019 criteria (manual and automated grading).

Main Results:

  • 93.1% performed at least one home measurement; 31.7% completed all 7 days.
  • Clinically usable quality achieved by 61.7% (manual) and 74.5% (automated).
  • Automated grading showed high agreement with manual review (ICC=0.90) but slightly overestimated quality.

Conclusions:

  • Smartphone spirometry is feasible for home-based asthma assessment in children.
  • Moderate compliance and acceptable measurement quality support clinical interpretation.
  • Automated grading is reliable but potential discrepancies require clinical consideration.
Abstract