Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Testing the Role of Multicopy Plasmids in the Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance
Published on: May 2, 2018
Resistance development in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae under ceftazidime/avibactam-meropenem pressure: KPC-2
Fu-Hao Li1,2,3, Mei Zheng1,2,3, Gong-Mei Zhong1,2,3
1Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract:
The ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI, CZA) combination is a potent agent against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections, but resistance readily emerges via KPC mutations that restore carbapenem susceptibility. Previous studies have shown that the CZA-meropenem (MEM) combination exhibits favorable therapeutic efficacy by exploiting this collateral sensitivity. Here, we investigated in vitro how this adjunctive combination impacts resistance evolution in KPC-Kp and delineated the underlying molecular mechanisms. Resistance evolution in 26 KPC-Kp isolates was selected by multipassaging under dual CZA-MEM pressure. The underlying resistant mechanisms were systematically dissected by integrating MICs, enzyme kinetics, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. In contrast to CZA alone, the CZA-MEM combination significantly suppressed resistance development, but five strains still adapted. Under dual-drug selection, mutations arose solely within KPC but were restricted to the Ω loop. Kinetic analysis showed that these mutations drive CZA resistance (R164S variants chiefly by increasing ceftazidime hydrolysis, R164L variants by weakening AVI inhibition, and D179Y by both mechanisms) while simultaneously restoring MEM susceptibility (all variants reduced MEM hydrolysis). Importantly, every mutant elevated the AVI IC50, suggesting this is the optimal evolutionary path for KPC-Kp under CZA-MEM pressure. Mechanistic studies reveal that R164L/T243S mutations destabilize the Ω loop to reposition Ser70 at the active site and confer AVI resistance by impairing acylation, destabilizing the enzyme-inhibitor complex, and potentially accelerating deacylation. Our study provides actionable clues for positioning and deploying different β-lactam agents in the treatment of KPC-Kp infections.IMPORTANCEThe global rise of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) severely limits available therapeutic options, underscoring the urgent need for strategies that curb resistance evolution. The ceftazidime/avibactam-meropenem combination exploits collateral sensitivity to suppress resistance development, yet adaptive mutations still emerge. However, the mechanisms underlying resistance development under dual-drug pressure remain unclear. This study focused on Ω-loop mutations in KPC under dual-drug pressure, revealing that these mutations concurrently enhance avibactam resistance and restore carbapenem susceptibility, although the potential contribution of additional genetic alterations cannot be fully excluded. These findings offer critical insights for optimizing combination therapies and monitoring resistance mechanisms during treatment of KPC-Kp infections.
Insights
The ceftazidime/avibactam-meropenem combination suppresses resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Mutations in KPC
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Drug Resistance
Background:
- KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections pose a significant global health threat.
- Resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) readily emerges through KPC mutations.
- The CAZ-AVI-meropenem (MEM) combination shows promise in overcoming resistance via collateral sensitivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of the CAZ-AVI-MEM combination on resistance evolution in KPC-Kp.
- To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance development under dual-drug pressure.
Main Methods:
- Multipassaging of 26 KPC-Kp isolates under dual CAZ-MEM selection.
- Analysis of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs).
- Enzyme kinetics, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.
Main Results:
- The CAZ-MEM combination significantly suppressed resistance development compared to CAZ alone.
- Five strains adapted, developing mutations solely within the KPC enzyme's Ω loop.
- These mutations conferred CAZ resistance while restoring carbapenem susceptibility by reducing MEM hydrolysis.
Conclusions:
- The CAZ-MEM combination effectively curbed resistance evolution in KPC-Kp.
- Ω-loop mutations in KPC represent an adaptive strategy conferring dual resistance.
- Findings provide insights for optimizing combination therapies against KPC-Kp infections.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotic Selection
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
