Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
Published on: March 12, 2021
Management of anterior shoulder instability in patients aged 40 and older: a systematic review
Seth Ybema1, Wahaj Khan2, Prushoth Vivekanantha3
1Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. seth.ybema@medportal.ca.
Purpose:
Anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is a common shoulder condition that primarily affects adolescents and young adults. In older adults this represents a distinct condition with a distinct pathomechanism and complication profile. This review synthesizes the literature on ASI in patients 40 years or older, focusing on injury characteristics, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes.
Methods:
Three databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase) were searched on October 18, 2025. Primary studies investigating operative or non-operative management of ASI in patients with onset of instability at ≥ 40 years old were included. Methodological quality was assessed using MINORS criteria. Data were collated utilizing descriptive statistics.
Results:
Ten studies were included with 541 patients, of which 315 were non-operative and 226 were operative. The most common concomitant injuries included rotator cuff tears (n = 219 of 409, 53.5%), Hills-Sachs lesions (n = 208 of 445, 46.7%), and glenoid bone defects (n = 20 of 249, 8.0%). The most common operative procedures were rotator cuff repair (80.5%, n = 182), Bankart repair (12.8%, n = 29), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (4.4%, n = 10). Recurrent instability occurred in 5.5% of operative patients (n = 21 of 380) and 15.0% of non-operative patients (23 of 153) among studies reporting rates. Both non-operative and operative management yielded favourable outcomes, with low recurrence and complication rates, and satisfactory range of motion.
Conclusions:
ASI in patients ≥ 40 years old is commonly associated with concomitant injuries and can be managed operatively or non-operatively depending on injuries and instability severity. Further prospective, comparative studies using standardized outcomes are needed to better define optimal management in this population.
Level Of Evidence:
IV, systematic review.