Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

11:13
Assessment of Viability of Human Fat Injection into Nude Mice with Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: January 7, 2015
Injectable Filler-Based Chin Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Non-Surgical Volumetric Techniques
Debraj Shome1, Debalina Bose2, Ashwin Prabhughate2
1Department of Facial Plastic Surgery and Facial Cosmetic Surgery, The Esthetic Clinics (TEC®), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. debraj.shome@theestheticclinics.com.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|August 3, 2026
Summary
Nonsurgical chin augmentation using injectable fillers offers a safe and effective short-term solution for improving facial harmony, with high patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to confirm long-term results.
Area of Science:
- Aesthetic Medicine
- Dermatology
- Plastic Surgery
Background:
- The chin significantly impacts facial aesthetics, harmony, and perceived attractiveness.
- Retrusion of the chin can negatively affect facial balance and self-perception.
- Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, including nonsurgical chin augmentation, are increasingly popular.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review injectable volumetric techniques for chin augmentation.
- To focus on dermal filler-based interventions for chin augmentation.
- To synthesize evidence on the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of these procedures.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review following PRISMA-E guidelines.
- Comprehensive search of seven databases (1965-2026).
- Analysis of study quality, data diversity, and heterogeneity (I²).
Main Results:
- Eleven studies with 876 patients were analyzed.
- Hyaluronic acid fillers were predominantly used, with average follow-up of 12.8 months.
- Over 90% patient satisfaction reported; adverse effects were minor and transient (e.g., edema, bruising).
Conclusions:
- Injectable fillers provide effective short-term chin augmentation with high patient satisfaction and acceptable safety.
- Current evidence is heterogeneous and largely non-comparative, limiting long-term outcome conclusions.
- Further controlled studies are necessary to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety.