Palliative hip surgery in nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy: outcomes of two surgical techniques

Veronica Lodovici1, Giorgio Marrè Brunenghi2, Lorenza Marengo2

  • 1Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa.

Insights

Palliative hip surgery in nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy effectively reduces pain and improves quality of life. Both Egermann and Girdlestone resection techniques offer viable options, with individualized selection based on patient needs.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Cerebral Palsy Research

Background:

  • Palliative hip surgery (PHS) is utilized for nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP).
  • Evaluating outcomes of different PHS techniques is crucial for optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare clinical, radiographic, and caregiver-reported outcomes of Egermann resection versus Girdlestone resection in nonambulatory CP patients.
  • To assess proximal femoral migration (PFM), pain, quality of life, and complications associated with each PHS technique.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 30 Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) V children (41 hips).
  • Analysis of radiographic PFM, caregiver-reported CP Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children (CP QOL-Child), visual analog scale for pain, and Clavien-Dindo-Sink (CDS) complications.
  • Follow-up at immediate post-op, 6-12 months, and final assessment.

Main Results:

  • Both PHS techniques provided satisfactory pain relief and improved caregiver-reported quality of life.
  • No significant difference in PFM between Egermann and Girdlestone resections at final follow-up.
  • Girdlestone resection showed fewer painful heterotopic ossifications requiring revision; overall complication rate was 32%.

Conclusions:

  • PHS is an effective palliative intervention for GMFCS V children with CP, offering pain relief and improved quality of life.
  • Both Egermann and Girdlestone resections are viable palliative options with distinct complication profiles.
  • Individualized surgical decision-making is recommended based on patient anatomy and functional requirements.

Related Concept Videos