Related Experiment Video For Delays in diagnosis
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Combined Supine and Standing Imaging for Varicocele: An Improved Diagnostic Approach
Published on: November 22, 2024
No time to waste: Evaluation of diagnostic delays in vulvar cancer
Julia C Sakach1, Molly Morton2, Jessica M Velasquez3
1The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
Objectives:
To identify patient, provider, and system-level factors associated with delayed diagnosis of vulvar squamous cell cancer (SCC).
Methods:
An IRB-approved retrospective single-institution cohort study was conducted in patients with vulvar SCC diagnosed from 2009 to 2020. Patients were compared by time from symptom onset to biopsy using a prespecified threshold of <6 months versus ≥6 months. Demographic, tumor, provider, and healthcare utilization variables were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined.
Results:
Among 157 eligible patients, 39 (24.8%) experienced a diagnostic delay of ≥6 months. Delayed diagnosis was not associated with age, race, smoking status, dermatologic conditions, tumor size, stage, insurance, or income. Patients with delayed diagnosis underwent more clinic visits, examinations, empiric therapies, and encounters before biopsy (all p ≤ 0.003). Initial provider specialty differed significantly between groups: patients diagnosed within 6 months were more likely to first present to a gynecologic provider, whereas those initially evaluated by non-gynecologic providers had longer median time to diagnosis (1.9 vs 4.7 months, p < 0.0001) and were more likely to experience delay ≥6 months (34.7% vs 16.5%, p = 0.0098). On multivariable analysis, higher BMI (aOR 1.05 per kg/m2, 95% CI 1.01-1.10) and initial evaluation by a non-gynecologic provider (aOR 2.24, 95% CI 1.03-5.01) independently predicted delay ≥6 months.
Conclusions:
Delayed diagnosis of vulvar SCC was associated primarily with provider and healthcare system-related factors rather than patient or tumor characteristics. Earlier biopsy, timely gynecologic referral, and improved patient and provider education may help facilitate more prompt diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.