Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Advanced vs basic life support outcomes in treatment of out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest: A registry-based cohort study
Ryan Silvagi1, Enrique Rodriguez-Fohn1, Ryan J Reece2
1Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA.
Importance:
The absolute effect on outcomes with Advanced, (ALS) as compared to Basic Life Support, (BLS) care in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest, (OHCA) remains unclear.
Objective:
To assess the association of ALS compared to BLS alone prehospital care on return of spontaneous circulation, (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcome in OHCA in Detroit, MI.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of 6746 patients from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival database from January 2016 to December 2021 who had non-traumatic OHCA and received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cohorts were grouped by ALS v BLS care then initial rhythm and then compared by chi-squared, multivariable logistic, and multinomial regression analysis for outcomes of sustained ROSC, survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. The BLS cohort is defined by units that provided manual CPR, automated rhythm and defibrillation, airway management, but no endotracheal intubation or parenteral medications. ALS care was defined as manual rhythm interpretation, manual defibrillation, intravenous or intraosseous drug administration or endotracheal intubation.
Results:
Mean age was 62.6 years (SD-16.7), with 56.3% male and 84.6% Black. Cohort breakdown: shockable ALS (S-ALS; n = 330, 4.9%); shockable BLS (S-BLS; n = 466, 6.9%); non-shockable ALS (NS-ALS; n = 2793, 41.4%); non-shockable BLS (NS-BLS; n = 3157, 46.8%). ROSC rates by cohort: S-ALS (37.9%); S-BLS (19.5%); NS-ALS (18.6%); NS-BLS (9.3%). ALS was associated with increased sustained ROSC for all initial rhythms (p < .001). S-ALS was associated with increased survival (p = .03), and neurologic outcome (p = .01) when compared to S-BLS.
Conclusion & Relevance:
Advanced Life Support, relative to Basic Life Support alone, was associated with improved sustained return of spontaneous circulation across all initial rhythms, and improved survival to discharge and favorable neurologic outcome in shockable initial rhythms.
More Related Videos
03:13Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies