Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Optimization of Breast Biopsy and Mastectomy Sample Collection Procedures for Biobanking, Personalized Medicine, and Research Applications
Published on: September 2, 2025
Mapping stakeholders for developing cancer research in Small Island Developing States: a descriptive study from the
Stephen B Johnson1, Tricia Black2, Boris Atabe1
1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
This study mapped cancer control stakeholders in the Eastern Caribbean, finding low overall interest but strong advocacy from support groups and implementers. These insights aim to boost political will for crucial cancer research in Small Island Developing States.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Health Policy
Background:
- Small Island Developing States (SIDS) face high cancer mortality due to limited local epidemiological data.
- Stakeholder engagement is crucial for driving cancer research and control initiatives in SIDS.
- The Cancer in Small Island Developing States of the Eastern Caribbean (CaSIDEC) study was developed to address these gaps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map cancer control stakeholders in the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) for the CaSIDEC study.
- To assess stakeholder interest and power to inform engagement strategies.
- To identify key groups influencing cancer research and policy in the region.
Main Methods:
- Stakeholders were identified through professional networks, snowballing, and public directories.
- Interest and power were scored based on available information and interactions.
- Stakeholders were categorized into engagement typologies: promoters, latent, advocates, or bystanders.
Main Results:
- Of 159 identified stakeholders, 96 were analyzed, comprising supporters (36%), policymakers (32%), implementers (18%), and civil society leaders (14%).
- Overall mean scores for interest and power were low (4.5/10 and 4.7/10, respectively).
- Stakeholders were classified as latent (29%), bystanders (28%), advocates (23%), and promoters (20%), with implementers and policymakers forming the majority of promoters.
Conclusions:
- This is the first stakeholder mapping for an epidemiological study in the Caribbean.
- Low interest in large-scale epidemiological studies was observed, similar to other developing countries.
- Cancer support groups and implementers emerged as strong advocates, highlighting their potential to drive research and policy.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

