Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

07:09
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Finite element evaluation of unilateral distraction splints: implications for temporomandibular joint loading
Burcu Genceli1, Berk Bilgen2, Sina Saygılı3
1Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Prof. Dr. Cavit Orhan Tutengil Street, Suleymaniye, Fatih, 34116, Istanbul, Turkey.
Odontology
|August 3, 2026
Summary
Unilateral distraction splints (DSs) for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders may cause compression, not distraction. Increased masseter force significantly impacts TMJ loading, while splint design influences stress and displacement.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Dental device analysis
- Finite element modeling
Background:
- Unilateral distraction splints (DSs) were historically used for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) therapy.
- Concerns exist that DSs may induce compressive forces on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) instead of the intended distraction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the biomechanical effects of two unilateral splint designs (DS7 and DS567) in a healthy TMJ model.
- To analyze the influence of ipsilateral masseter force and capsular stiffness on TMJ responses.
Main Methods:
- Finite element analysis of a TMJ model derived from cone-beam computed tomography data.
- Simulation of unilateral clenching under varying masseter force and capsular stiffness.
- Calculation of condylar and disc stress and displacement using nonlinear static analysis.
Main Results:
- Increased ipsilateral masseter force significantly elevated condylar and disc displacement.
- The DS7 design resulted in substantially higher disc (60%) and condylar (30%) movement compared to DS567.
- Capsular stiffness had a minimal effect on displacement (<2.5%).
- Both condyles exhibited superior, compressive movement; contralateral structures showed higher stress peaks.
Conclusions:
- Unilateral distraction splints predominantly induce compressive, not distractive, forces on the TMJ under simulated conditions.
- Masseter muscle force is the primary factor determining TMJ loading, with capsular stiffness playing a minor role.
- Broader splint coverage may modulate load transmission, reducing stress and displacement.
