Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

07:09
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Finite element evaluation of unilateral distraction splints: implications for temporomandibular joint loading
Burcu Genceli1, Berk Bilgen2, Sina Saygılı3
1Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Prof. Dr. Cavit Orhan Tutengil Street, Suleymaniye, Fatih, 34116, Istanbul, Turkey.
Odontology
|August 3, 2026
Summary
Unilateral distraction splints (DSs) for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders may cause compression, not distraction. Finite element analysis showed masseter muscle force, not capsule stiffness, significantly impacts TMJ loading and displacement.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Dental device analysis
- Finite element analysis
Background:
- Unilateral distraction splints (DSs) were historically used for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) therapy.
- Concerns exist that DSs may induce compressive forces on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) rather than the intended distractive effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the biomechanical behavior of two unilateral splint designs (DS7 and DS567) in a healthy TMJ model.
- To analyze the influence of ipsilateral masseter force and capsular stiffness on TMJ stress and displacement.
Main Methods:
- A finite element analysis model of a healthy TMJ was created using cone-beam computed tomography data.
- Simulated unilateral clenching under varying masseter force and capsular stiffness conditions.
- Nonlinear static analysis to calculate condylar and disc stress and displacement.
Main Results:
- Increased ipsilateral masseter force significantly elevated condylar and disc displacement.
- The DS7 design resulted in higher disc (60%) and condylar (30%) movement compared to DS567.
- Capsular stiffness had a minor effect on displacement; masseter force was the dominant loading factor.
- Both condyles exhibited superior, compressive movement; contralateral structures showed higher stress peaks.
Conclusions:
- Unilateral distraction splints primarily induce compressive, not distractive, forces on the TMJ.
- Splint geometry, specifically broader coverage, can modulate load transmission and reduce stress/displacement.
- Masseter muscle force is a critical determinant of TMJ loading during simulated clenching.
