Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
Reassessing the validity of AI cephalometric landmark identification: an analytical perspective on Ye et al. (2023)
Jiangwei Liao1, Jinghong Yu2, Fulin Jiang3
1State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Orthodontic, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, 145 West Changle Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Abstract:
To provide the public and non-specialist readers with clear insight, we re-evaluate a published study claiming that artificial intelligence (AI) software performs as accurately as orthodontist experts in identifying key points on dental X-ray images. Our analysis reveals flaws in the original research methods: inconsistent image processing led to unreliable measurements, and critical details about data sources were missing. Most importantly, when we repeated the experiment with new X-ray images and protocols, over 80% of the AI's landmark identifications showed significantly higher error rates than originally reported-contradicting the claim that AI matches expert accuracy. We urge methodological rigor in future studies on AI's role in dentistry.
More Related Videos
05:49Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025