Folate Receptor Immunohistochemical Staining Heterogeneity in Gynecologic Cancers

Barrett C Lawson1, Anais Malpica

  • 1Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Insights

Re-evaluating folate receptor alpha (FRα) expression in ovarian cancer cases revealed significant discrepancies between original reports and expert review. These scoring differences, particularly in heterogeneous staining, impact patient eligibility for targeted therapies like mirvetuximab soravtansine.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Pathology
  • Oncology
  • Immunohistochemistry

Background:

  • Mirvetuximab soravtansine targets folate receptor alpha (FRα) and is approved for FRα-high ovarian cancer.
  • Accurate FRα assessment is crucial for patient selection for targeted therapies.
  • Heterogeneous FRα expression can pose challenges in immunohistochemical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare original FOLR1 (FRα) immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring with expert re-evaluation in a cohort of gynecologic pathology cases.
  • To assess the impact of scoring discrepancies on potential clinical management decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 120 gynecologic pathology cases with prior FOLR1 IHC.
  • Collection of clinical and pathological data, including specimen type and FIGO stage.
  • Independent re-scoring of FOLR1 IHC by two gynecologic pathologists, evaluating staining intensity, percentage, pattern, and abrupt transitions.
  • Comparison of original reported scores with re-evaluated scores to identify significant changes.

Main Results:

  • Original reports classified 56.3% of 119 cases as FRα positive, while re-review found 42.5% of 120 cases positive.
  • A clinically significant change (positive to negative or vice versa) occurred in 15.1% of cases.
  • Resection specimens showed a higher rate of significant scoring changes (19.8%) compared to biopsy specimens (5.3%).
  • Seventeen cases initially reported as positive were reclassified as negative, impacting potential treatment eligibility.

Conclusions:

  • Significant discordance exists between routine FOLR1 IHC reporting and expert pathological review.
  • Heterogeneous FRα expression patterns contribute to scoring variability and interpretation challenges.
  • Standardized scoring criteria and pathologist training are essential to ensure accurate FRα assessment for targeted therapy selection in ovarian cancer.

Related Concept Videos