Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Abdominal Tumors
Published on: March 7, 2011
Prediction Models for Infection Severity after Thermal Ablation of Liver Malignant Tumors
Lin Jiang1, Xiaoju Li1, Xiaoli Wang1
1Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
To identify predictors and develop models for predicting infection severity following percutaneous thermal ablation for liver malignancies.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 8655 ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous thermal ablations at a single center (January 2010-November 2023) were retrospectively reviewed. The study included 172 patients (mean age, 58.5 years [SD ± 11.4]; 145 men), with 86 infected (18 severe and 68 nonsevere) and 86 noninfected patients. Patients developing infection within 30 days were classified as severe (septic shock or infection-related death) or nonsevere. A noninfected control group was matched by the treatment date. A scoring system was developed to identify infection in patients with postablative fever. Two multivariate logistic regression models were constructed: 1 using preablative variables and another combining preablative and postablative characteristics.
Results:
Among 8655 ablations, 86 (0.99%) developed postablative infections. All infected patients developed postprocedural fever, compared with 29.1% (25/86) in controls. An infection screening score (cutoff ≥ 3) achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 0.910. For predicting infection severity, the preablation model identified metastatic tumor (odds ratio [OR], 4.98; P = .009) and subcapsular location (OR, 7.68; P = .002) as independent predictors, with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.774, sensitivity of 0.889, and specificity of 0.500. The combined model included preprocedural monocyte ratio (monocyte count divided by white blood cell count: OR, 0.71; P < .001), subcapsular location (OR, 624.86; P < .001), and postfever procalcitonin (OR, 1.78; P < .001), outperformed the preablation model (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.966; sensitivity, 0.889; specificity, 0.912).
Conclusions:
Infection severity after liver tumor ablation was effectively predicted. The combined model demonstrated excellent performance and could facilitate early risk stratification for timely intervention.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
10:23A Computational Modeling Approach to Investigate the Influence of Hyperthermia on the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: December 1, 2023