Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Manual versus robotic-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty for instability : a one-year cohort analysis
Alexander Burbelo1, William Stone1, Trace Clark1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia, USA.
Aims:
Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a treatment option for failed primary TKA but is associated with higher complication rates and technical challenges. Robotic-assisted rTKA (rarTKA) is an emerging technique that may improve component alignment and surgical precision. However, its effect on early postoperative outcomes in rTKA for instability remains unclear.
Methods:
A total of 133 consecutive rTKAs for instability (82 manual and 51 robotic) performed by two fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. All rarTKAs used the MAKO robotic-arm system. Operating time, length of stay (LOS), joint line change, posterior condylar offset (PCO) change, and all-cause 30-/90-day complications were compared using univariable analyses. Revision implant constructs were also compared. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed at three months and one year, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed one-year reoperation-free survival.
Results:
RarTKA achieved a greater mean increase in PCO (3.4 mm vs 1.5 mm; p = 0.014), but required a longer operating time (186 minutes vs 173 minutes; p = 0.037). Joint line change, LOS, three-month KOOS-JR, and ROM did not differ significantly. The 30-day (4.9% vs 7.8%) and 90-day (7.3% vs 11.8%) complication rates and one-year reoperation-free survival (91.5% vs 94.1%; p = 0.900) were comparable. Although offset couplers were not used, rarTKA constructs incorporated augments more frequently.
Conclusion:
RarTKA demonstrated early postoperative outcomes and complication rates comparable to those of conventional manual rTKA, while achieving improved PCO restoration despite longer operating times. LOS, functional outcomes, and one-year survivorship were similar between groups. Overall, rarTKA appears to be safe and effective; however, further investigation is required to determine the long-term benefits and clinical significance.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:33In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Published on: May 5, 2023