Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Difficulty and Deviation. High Task Failure Encourages Alternative Approaches to Learning
Dave Bright1, Jenny Smith1, Philip Kearney2
1Institute of Applied Sciences, University of Chichester, Chichester, UK.
Participants adapt to challenging motor skill tasks by altering strategies, not always following instructions. This impacts intrinsic motivation and cognitive effort, highlighting the need to observe actual behavior in research.
Area of Science:
- Motor Skill Acquisition
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Task difficulty significantly influences the learning of new motor skills.
- Individuals may adjust task parameters to maintain success, deviating from set instructions.
- Understanding these adaptive behaviors is crucial for effective skill acquisition research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how participants modify their strategies when faced with increasing task difficulty in a motor skill task.
- To examine the relationship between task difficulty, intrinsic motivation, and cognitive effort.
- To determine if participants disclose their strategy deviations when given the opportunity.
Main Methods:
- An on-screen target interception task was employed, with difficulty progressively increased by reducing racquet size.
- Measures of intrinsic motivation and cognitive effort were collected throughout the experiment.
- Participants' adherence to instructions versus their actual performance strategies were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Increased task difficulty led participants to adopt a tactical approach, intercepting fewer targets than instructed.
- Intrinsic motivation decreased as task difficulty rose, while cognitive effort concurrently increased.
- Participants did not disclose their modified strategies when opportunities were provided.
Conclusions:
- Participant behavior in motor skill tasks can deviate from instructions, especially under high difficulty.
- Cognitive effort and intrinsic motivation dynamics reveal complex engagement patterns despite strategy changes.
- Research methodologies must account for observed participant behavior rather than solely relying on instructed or predicted actions.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Social Loafing