Related Experiment Videos
Effects of meropenem plus ulinastatin on inflammatory response and complications in patients with severe septic shock
Dan Wu1, Wei Ni1, Xinying Zhang1
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Aim:
To evaluate whether receipt of ulinastatin in addition to meropenem-based standard care was associated with inflammatory, coagulation, perfusion, and clinical outcomes in patients with severe septic shock.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective, non-randomized comparative cohort study included 106 consecutive patients with severe septic shock treated between January 2023 and November 2025. Patients were classified according to treatment received in routine clinical practice: meropenem-based standard care plus ulinastatin (observation group, n = 53) or meropenem-based standard care alone (control group, n = 53). Twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality was presented as the principal objective patient-centered clinical outcome, whereas the total effective rate was reported only as an exploratory secondary outcome.
Results:
The overall response rate in the observation group presented higher at 90.6% (48/53) versus 73.6% (39/53) in the control group (p < 0.05). Post-treatment, the observation group presented lower levels of CRP, PCT, IL-6, IL-8, along with TNF-α (p < 0.05). For coagulation, post-treatment Fib levels were lower in the observation group compared to the control group, while PT and APTT were markedly shortened in the observation group (p < 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters-heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), along with cardiac index (CI)-showed greater improvement in the observation group (p < 0.05). Regarding immunity, the observation group presented higher CD4+ T cell counts and CD4+/CD8+ ratios, as well as significantly lower CD8+ T cell counts versus the control group (p < 0.05). The 6-h and 24-h lactate clearance rates were significantly higher in the observation group (p < 0.001 for both). ICU stay and mechanical ventilation duration were shorter in the observation group (p < 0.001 for both). The complication rate was 9.4% (5/53) in the observation group, which was lower than the 24.5% (13/53) seen in the control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
In this single-center retrospective cohort, receipt of ulinastatin in addition to meropenem-based standard care was associated with more favorable inflammatory, coagulation, lactate-clearance, hemodynamic, immune, and resource-use outcomes. Because treatment was not randomized and residual confounding cannot be excluded, these findings should not be interpreted as proof of causality or synergy.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Inflammation III: Local and Systemic Effects
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care