Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Case Report: Sequential leadless pacing after battery depletion in a patient with recurrent device-related infection
Assel Chinybayeva1, Gaziza Marat1, Zhanasyl Suleymen1,2
1Heart Rhythm Scientific Research Institute, NpJSC "Astana Medical University", Astana, Kazakhstan.
Background:
Leadless pacemakers offer an important alternative for patients with recurrent cardiac implantable electronic device infections. However, clinical data on long-term management and sequential implantation strategies after battery depletion remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a sequential leadless-only pacing strategy in a patient with a multi-decade history of pacing-related complications.
Case Presentation:
We report the long-term clinical course of a patient with a 26-year history of cardiac pacing (2000-2026). Following multiple transvenous system failures and recurrent infections, the patient transitioned to a leadless platform in 2017. We describe the clinical rationale and procedural outcome of upgrading from a depleted first-generation leadless pacemaker (Micra VR, implanted 2017, left in situ at the right ventricular septum) to an AV-synchronous leadless pacemaker (Micra AV, implanted 2025 because of battery depletion of the prior device, not infection) using a leave-in-situ approach.
Results:
Sequential implantation was successfully performed in 2025, with the new device implanted at the right ventricular mid-septum while the previously implanted device was left in situ. Acute electrical parameters were satisfactory (pacing threshold 0.63 V, R-wave amplitude 9.8 mV, impedance 720 Ω), with no evidence of inappropriate sensing. At follow-up, electrical parameters remained stable (pacing threshold 0.50 V, impedance 670-650 Ω), with atrioventricular synchrony of 80% at 1 month and 84-85% at 3-6 months. No clinical or device-telemetry evidence of mechanical interaction or electrical interference between the devices was observed during follow-up. No device-related complications occurred during follow-up.
Conclusion:
A sequential leadless-only pacing strategy, including a leave-in-situ approach, may represent a feasible and safe long-term option in selected high-risk patients with device-related infections and a history of transvenous system extraction.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
