Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
Published on: May 22, 2020
Disparities in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) monitoring capacity in eastern Canada
Tsz Kin Siu1, Alexandra Del Favero-Campbell1, Daniel G Rainham2
1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University, 6287 Alumni Cres, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.
Abstract:
Standards for air pollution are becoming more stringent. Canada will update the annual average fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standard to 8 µg m-3 in 2030, which questions the adequacy of existing PM2.5 monitoring capacity for evaluating potential exceedances and exposure risk at community level. Although PM2.5 monitoring has expanded beyond regulatory monitors to include low-cost sensors, concerns remain regarding inequalities in its effective coverage and thus data representativeness for exposure estimations. Understanding the connections between PM2.5 monitor density, surface exposure, and neighbourhood socio-economic deprivation and health vulnerability is important for addressing compounded inequities. In this study, we applied locally adaptive kernel density estimation to calculate total PM2.5 monitor density from 2020 to 2024 in Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada. Local bandwidths were defined for each monitored location by considering the surrounding variability of surface PM2.5 concentrations and its sensitivity to distinguish exceedances. Suburban communities of Montreal, Toronto, near-border regions of Windsor and Niagara, southeast Kitchener, and remote communities in northwest Ontario had observed multiple disparities, with more pronounced socio-economic marginalization, higher surface exposure, but inadequate monitoring. Based on mixed-effects logistic regression, residential instability and situationally vulnerable populations had 25% and 54% higher odds of being deprived in PM2.5 monitoring capacity, respectively, after controlling for surface PM2.5 and emission facility density. Assessments of random-effects also suggested the importance of locally adapted strategies to account for provincial and inter-municipality variations in monitoring disparities among socio-economically marginalized groups and populations with physical or psychological disabilities. Overall, our findings inform vulnerable communities in need of monitoring expansion for precise air quality control and health risk assessments in light of the new standard.
More Related Videos
05:45Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022