Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

05:36
Herbs-Partitioned Moxibustion on the Navel in a Rat Model of Primary Dysmenorrhea with Cold Coagulation and Blood Stasis
Published on: October 4, 2024
Digital Interventions for Female Sexual Pain Disorders: A Systematic Review with Evidence Mapping and Limited
1Eva Women Health Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
|August 5, 2026
Summary
Digital interventions show promise for female sexual pain disorders like GPPPD and vulvodynia. Guided digital formats demonstrated stronger engagement and potential improvements in sexual function and pain outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Sexual Health
- Digital Therapeutics
- Women's Health
Background:
- Female sexual pain disorders, including genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD)/vaginismus and vulvodynia/vestibulodynia, present significant barriers to accessing specialized care.
- Digital interventions offer a potential solution to overcome these access challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize evidence on the clinical efficacy and engagement of digital interventions for female sexual pain disorders.
- To map the existing evidence across various digital formats, including internet-based programs, apps, and digital therapeutics.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review incorporating evidence mapping and limited quantitative synthesis.
- Inclusion of 51 studies for qualitative synthesis and 3 studies for quantitative synthesis.
- Analysis of digital formats such as guided internet-based programs, app-based interventions, and digital therapeutics.
Main Results:
- Digital interventions suggest potential improvements in penetration-related outcomes, sexual function, and pain-related outcomes.
- Guided digital formats exhibited stronger user engagement compared to other formats.
- Evidence synthesis included 51 studies qualitatively and 3 studies quantitatively.
Conclusions:
- Digital care for female sexual pain disorders appears promising, offering a scalable approach to treatment.
- The current body of literature is methodologically heterogeneous, requiring further high-quality research.
- Strongest direct evidence is concentrated within a limited number of diagnosis-specific trials, highlighting the need for more research.
