Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

"Liver-on-a-Chip" Cultures of Primary Hepatocytes and Kupffer Cells for Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Published on: February 19, 2019
Predicting Recompensation in Alcohol, HBV and HCV-associated Decompensated Cirrhosis
Umang Arora1, Ritik Goyal1, Ishan Gupta1
1Department of Gastroenterology & Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Background:
Recompensation of cirrhosis represents sustained clinical improvement in decompensated cirrhosis following effective etiological treatment. Baseline predictors can help prognostication in hepatology practice.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study of patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to alcohol-associated (ALD) or viral (HBV or HCV) cirrhosis who received etiology-specific treatment following decompensation. Demographic details, laboratory parameters, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) parameters were recorded at index decompensation, presentation, and follow-up. Recompensation was defined per Baveno-VII criteria. CT-derived sarcopenia (L3) and vertebral bone density (L1) were obtained when scans were available within 2 years of decompensation. Fine-Gray competing risk regression accounted for death, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation as competing events.
Results:
Of 244 patients (median age 43 (35-50) years; 78.7% males) with ALD (n = 104), HBV (n = 81), or HCV (n = 59) decompensated cirrhosis, 70 (28.7%) achieved recompensation over a median follow-up of 38 months (IQR 18.5-69). Recompensation was more frequent in HBV(42%) and HCV(35.6%) cirrhosis vs ALD (14.4%, P < 0.001). Recompensated patients had lower MELD score (10.1 vs 14.7, P < 0.001), bilirubin (1.5 vs 2.2 mg/dL, P = 0.006), and INR (1.3 vs 1.5, P = 0.002) at baseline. Univariate competing-risk analysis showed stepwise reduction in recompensation likelihood with increasing MELD category (MELD 10-15: sHR 0.56, MELD >15: sHR 0.34, vs MELD <10). On multivariable analysis, higher platelet count, absence of jaundice at baseline, and HBV etiology were independently associated with recompensation. LSM (n = 145) was numerically lower in recompensated patients (29.3 vs 36.9 kPa, P = 0.1), with greater median decline at follow-up (-20.7% vs 0%, P = 0.007). CT-based measurements (n = 69) showed recompensated patients had lower prevalence of sarcopenia (27.3% vs 59.6%, P = 0.01), higher vertebral bone density (243.1 ± 50.5 vs 196.2 ± 62.8 HU, P = 0.003), and no osteopenia (L1 vertebral body density <150 HU, 0% vs 31.9%, P = 0.003). Three (4.3%) recompensated patients developed HCC.
Conclusion:
Recompensation occurs in one-fourth of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and is more frequent in viral than alcohol-associated etiologies. Higher platelet count and absence of jaundice at baseline independently predicted recompensation.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Cirrhosis II: Pathophysiology
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Liver Regeneration
Cells of Liver
The liver comprises four major types of cells— hepatocytes, stellate, Kupffer, and sinusoidal endothelial cells. The hepatocytes are large...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment