Related Experiment Videos
Classification of patient-ventilator asynchronies, development of an updated conceptual framework: Scoping review
Michel Perez-Garzon1, Henry Robayo-Amortegui2, Jaime Fernandez-Sarmiento3
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Extracorporeal Life Support Unit, Fundación Clínica Shaio, Bogotá DC, Colombia; PhD Programm in Clinical Science, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Cundinamarca, Chía, Colombia.
Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) impacts many invasive mechanical ventilation patients, leading to worse outcomes. This review proposes a new, flexible five-level PVA classification framework for better clinical use and AI integration.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Respiratory Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) affects up to 85% of patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
- PVA is linked to prolonged ventilation duration, increased complications, and higher mortality rates.
- Current PVA classification systems are inconsistent, difficult to apply clinically, and not validated for advanced technology integration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate existing patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) classification systems.
- To propose an operational and flexible PVA classification framework for intensive care unit (ICU) settings.
- To facilitate future integration of PVA detection with artificial intelligence (AI).
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was performed across major databases and gray literature.
- The review adhered to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for study selection and analysis.
- Two independent reviewers selected and analyzed studies proposing, evaluating, or validating PVA classifications.
Main Results:
- Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing significant methodological heterogeneity and limited external validity.
- Identified PVA detection approaches included waveform analysis, respiratory drive assessment, and AI models.
- Inconsistencies in terminology, thresholds, and detection methods hindered clinical implementation, leading to the development of a novel five-level hierarchical framework.
Conclusions:
- Existing PVA classification systems lack standardization and practical clinical applicability.
- A novel five-level classification framework is proposed, designed to be operational, ventilator-mode agnostic, reproducible, and adaptable for AI systems.
- This framework aims to enhance bedside decision-making, standardize research, and enable AI-based automation in PVA detection and management.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)